Quantcast
Channel: Healthcare IT News - Quality and Safety
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 1973

IBM's Truven names 15 top health systems

$
0
0
The analytics firm dove deep into the data to make its picks.

Truven Health Analytics prides itself on, well, analyzing data. So when it came to picking this year’s top 15 hospitals, Truven analysts turned to crunching numbers.

The winning health systems are those who showed higher survival rates and fewer errors at a lower overall treatment cost than any of the other health systems across the country.

  • Overall mortality rates were 14.7 percent lower than non-winning peer group hospitals
  • Complication rates were 15.1 percent lower
  • ED wait times were 12.3 percent lower.

The 15 health systems also lowered cost per episode by 5 percent, discharged patients from the hospital a half-day sooner than non-winners. Moreover, they showed y percent higher Patient Satisfaction Scores compared with the non-winning hospitals.

The 2016 edition of 15 Top Health Systems evaluated 338 health systems and 2,912 member hospitals to identify the systems with the highest overall achievement on a balanced scorecard.

Here are the winners:

Large Health Systems (operating expense of more than $1.75 billion)

Mayo Foundation – Rochester, Minn.

Mercy – Chesterfield, Missouri

Spectrum Health – Grand Rapids, Michigan

Sutter Health – Sacramento, California

Sutter Health Valley Division – Sacramento, California

Medium Health Systems (operating expense between $750 million and $1.75 billion)

Kettering Health Network – Dayton, Ohio

Scripps Health – San Diego, California

St. Luke's Health System – Boise, Idaho

St. Vincent Health – Indianapolis

TriHealth – Cincinnati, Ohio

Small Health Systems (operating expense of less than $750 million)

Asante – Medford, Oregon

Lovelace Health System – Albuquerque, New Mexico

MidMichigan Health – Midland, Michigan


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 1973

Trending Articles